American Renaissance for the Twenty-first Century | Article
A New Perspective On The Nature Of Public Monuments
by Donald Reynolds
Although monuments are
often perceived simply as another form of public sculpture,
they are first and foremost most reminders — the word comes
from the Latin monere, which means to remind — and symbols
of our traditions and values.9 We build monuments
to people and events because those people and events are
important to us for the values they possess or represent. In
addition to communicating our traditions, beliefs, and
values from generation to generation, monuments also help us
to come to terms with the unknown, the unexplained, and the
mysteries of life — as well as with our deepest emotions at
the social and at the personal level, such as the pain we
feel at the death of a love one.
Survival Through Celebration
"The past is not dead history," [René] Dubos has written,
"it is the living material out of which man makes himself
and builds the future," insisted the eminent scientist and
author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning So Human an Animal.13
From our past come the timeless, universal, and elemental
truths that governed our earliest evolution, determined our
gradual development as human beings over eons of time, and
by which we slowly achieved our intellectual and spiritual
potential that has enabled us to produce symphonies, conquer
disease, and explore the mysteries of the universe. When we
lose touch with the past, we lose touch with the inner self,
Dubos believes. We are cut off from what he calls "the
deepest layers" of our nature, a kind of genetic and
cultural memory bank, that repository of experiences and
images that enables us to understand and deal with that
mysterious and wonderful world of the past, which keeps us
in tune with our origins and with the rest of the cosmos...14
"In assuring continuity with the past through our public
monuments, we assist our own survival," by means of what art
historian Wayne Dynes calls the "triad of survival —
observation, contemplation, and preservation."17
The social anthropologist, Francis Huxley, would say that
monuments objectify those truths, which constitute our
cultural heritage, and so provide us with permanent and
tangible means to study and analyze them.18
"The wise man preserves that which he values and celebrates
that which he preserves."19 I think the key word
in this adage is "celebrates." It is not enough to gather at
the base of a monument once a year and engage in religious,
commemorative, or other ceremonies in which we honor the
person or the event. Those celebrations are important, to be
sure, and they contribute to our awareness as well as to our
own edification and enjoyment, as we join with others to
honor the values we cherish and wish to preserve.
Celebration in the fullest sense, however, is not restricted
to the formal ceremony once a year or on anniversaries. The
word comes from the Latin and means "much frequented,"
suggesting continuity of involvement. To celebrate a
monument properly, then, is to incorporate it into the
everyday life of our society at all levels. Monuments should
inspire us to study and analyze the people and events they
commemorate and to contemplate the values they perpetuate.
The monuments in our neighborhoods, for example, should be
part of our grade school curriculum, and they should be
objects of continuing study at the college and university
level. Monuments should be mini-laboratories of human values
and the objects of interdisciplinary study and research.
It is through celebration, then, that the monument becomes a
living force within our society for greater understanding
and respect for human values...
Monument to Neglect
If we do not integrate our monuments into our daily lives
through preservation and appropriate celebration, we forget
them, neglect them, and even destroy them with improper
maintenance. Witness the tragedy of the Washington Arch in
New York City, not only one of the nation's most important
tributes to George Washington, but also one of America's
architectural and sculptural gems of the City Beautiful
Movement, deserving of preservation and celebration for its
monumental significance as well as for its artistic merit.30
Yet, the monument is disintegrating, and the City of New
York has erected a fence around it to protect the public
from the statuary and ornamental marble falling from the
monument... Unfortunately, the root cause of the monument's
destruction, which is neglect, has yet to be addressed. That
is because the Washington Arch is not properly regarded as a
monument. It has lost its meaning because it is not
integrated into the community through appropriate
celebration...
A philosophy of celebration that fully integrates society
with its public monuments acknowledges that monuments,
before they are public art, or components of urban planning,
or civic design, are primarily symbols and embodiments of
traditions and human values, and that monuments are tangible
and permanent means by which we perpetuate those traditions
and values.
If we are to reclaim our "monuments to neglect" and prevent
their continued deterioration and outright destruction, we
must adopt this philosophy of celebration, and we must
develop a policy of preservation and education to implement
that philosophy.
Our preservation policy must assure that we maintain and
preserve our public monuments in perpetuity. Such a policy
requires that standards and guidelines be established and
supervised by professionals in dialogue with the community.
There must be full and open disclosure of all conservational
methods and techniques employed.
Our policy of education should take the form of education
programs at the elementary and high school levels designed
to produce a generation of citizens who are familiar with
our public monuments and instructed in the historical,
cultural, and aesthetic principles they embody.
Our colleges should expand their liberal arts curricula to
include the interdisciplinary study of public monuments.
Classroom and laboratory work should be supplemented by
internships.
Curriculum development in public monuments at the university
level should encourage research and publication. Chairs
should be endowed to assure continued research and
development in the field of public monuments.
Through symposia, lectures, special programs, and
publications, the general public should be informed of the
various aspects of our public monuments and the timely
issues pertaining to them.33
9.Johnson, "Do You
Know..."Reynolds, Monuments and Masterpieces,pp.xi-xii.
10. Donald Martin Reynolds, "Monuments to Neglect,"
Symposium on Public
Monuments, reprinted in Sculpture Review 40,no.1 (1991):
20-25, and American
Arts Quarterly, Fall 1991, pp.4-7
13. Dubos, So Human an Animal, p. 242.
14. Ibid., p. 76.
17. Wayne Dynes, "Monument, the Term," Symposium on Public
Monuments.
18. Francis Huxley, The Way of the Sacred (London:Bloomsbury
Books, 1989), p. 60.
19. Reynolds, Monuments and Masterpieces, p. xii; "Monuments
to Neglect," Sculpture Review, p.23; American Arts
Quarterly, p.6.
30. Reynolds, Monuments and Masterpiece, pp. 356-66. "
Monuments to Neglect?"
New York Newsday, April 18, 1989, p. 60. "Monuments to
Neglect," Symposium,
Sculpture Review, American Arts Quarterly.
33. To achieve those objectives, the Monuments Conservancy,
a not-for-
profit corporation, was established by the author in 1992...